"Whether Foreigner or Alien..." was cited in Darren A. Prum and Chad G. Marzen, 20 Tex. Hisp. J.L. & Pol'y 1, 46 (Spring 2014).

Cited in:  Jeffrey A. Van Detta, Some Legal Considerations For E.U.-Based MNEs Contemplating High-Risk Foreign Direct Investments in the Energy Sector After Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Chevron Corporation v. Naranjo, 9 S.C. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 161, 241 (Spring 2013). 

The article is cited for: 

(arguing that the House emendation of "foreigner" from the Senate Bill to "alien" in the Judiciary Act as passed evidences an even further narrowing of the scope of the ATS to apply: "Considering Article III of the Constitution and the related provisions in the Judiciary Act of 1789, along with the late eighteenth century legal, international, and general uses and definitions of "alien" and "foreigner"-in conjunction with relevant changes that occurred from the Senate's handwritten draft of the judicial bill through subsequent codifications of relevant sections of the Judiciary Act of 1789-it is fair to say that an understanding of what Congress intended by the deceptively simple change from "foreigner" to "alien" was a narrowing of the ATS; making it available to "aliens" but not to "foreigners," . . . in other words, making it available only to residents of the United States.").

Cited in Ishai Mooreville, A Question of Sovereignty   The History Behind Attorney General Bradford's 1795 Opinion on the Alien Tort Statute, 40 Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com. 21 (Issue 2, Spring 2013).

Cited in "Alien Invasion: Corporate Liability and Its Real Implications Under the Alien Tort Statute," by Brian Jacek, Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 43, Iss. 1 (2013).

Kiobel: Supreme Court Amicus

In KBR, Inc.'s supplemental amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court in Kiobel on August 12, 2012, they devote six pages to "Whether Foreigner or Alien...."  They did a great job of conveying what took me 60+ pages in just 6! 

Also, The Washington Legal Foundation's amicus also gave my article a shout out here.

M. Anderson Berry, Whether Foreigner or Alien: A New Look at the Original Language of the Alien Tort Statue, was cited by Joel Slawotsky, Corporate Liability in Alien Tort Litigation, VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ONLINE, Vol. I, p. 27 (2011).

In a scathing and shoot-from-the-hip article entitled, "An Alien by Any Other Name: Debunking a New Attempt to Re-Write the Original Language of the Alien Tort Statute," Rick Herz and Lorraine Leete attack  M. Anderson Berry's "Whether Foreigner or Alien: A New Look at the Original Language of the Alien Tort Statute," 27 Berkeley J. of Int’l. L. 316 (2009). See BJIL's online publication, Publicist, Vol. 7, Winter 2011.